Josephine the Singer, or The Mouse
Peoplep
OUR SINGER’S NAME IS Josephine. Anyone who has not
heard her does not know the power of song. There is not one among
us who is not swept away by her singing, and this is indeed high
praise—higher still as we are not generally a music-loving people.
Peace and quiet is the music most dear to us; we have a hard life
and even on the occasions when we have tried to shake free from the
cares of our daily life we still cannot raise ourselves up to
something so lofty and remote from our routine lives as music. But
we don’t much mourn this, we never even get that far; we consider a
certain pragmatic cunning, of which we are sorely in need, to be
our greatest asset, and with a smile born of this cunning we are
wont to console ourselves for all our woes even if—but it never
happens—we were once to yearn for the kind of happiness such as
music might provide. Josephine is the sole exception, she loves
music and also knows how to give voice to it; she is the only one,
and with her demise music will disappear—for who knows how
long—from our lives.
I have often wondered what this music of hers truly
means—after all, we are entirely unmusical, so how is it that we
understand Josephine’s singing or, since Josephine denies that, at
least believe we understand it? The simplest answer would be that
the beauty of her song is so great that even the dullest ear cannot
help being touched, but this is not a satisfying answer. If this
were really so, her singing would necessarily give one the
immediate and lasting impression of something extraordinary, the
feeling that something is pouring forth from this throat that we
had never heard before, something we did not even have the capacity
to hear, something that this Josephine alone and no one else could
enable us to hear. But this, in my opinion, is precisely what does
not happen; I do not feel it, nor have I observed that others feel
it. Among our circle we freely admit that Josephine’s song, as
song, is nothing out of the ordinary.
Is this in fact singing at all? Despite our lack of
musicality, we do have a tradition of singing, for our people sang
in ancient times; this is spoken of in legends, and some songs have
survived, although it is also true that now no one can sing them.
So we do have some ideas about what singing is, and Josephine’s art
does not correspond to these ideas. Then is it really singing?
Isn’t it perhaps merely piping?16 Piping is something we
all know about; it is the true artistic forte of our people or,
rather than our forte, more a characteristic expression of life. We
all pipe, but of course no one dreams of presenting this as an art
form; we pay no attention to our piping or even notice it, and
there are many among us who are quite unaware that piping is one of
our characteristics. So if it were true that Josephine does not
sing but only pipes and may not, as it seems to me at least, even
rise above the level of our usual piping—and may not even have the
stamina required for this usual piping, whereas a common fieldhand
can effortlessly pipe all day long while hard at work—so if it were
all true, Josephine’s supposed artistry would certainly be refuted,
but that would open up the larger riddle of the enormous influence
she has.
However, it is not just piping that she produces.
If you position yourself quite far away from her or, better yet,
put yourself through the following test—say, Josephine were singing
along with others and you tried to pick out just her voice—you will
undoubtedly identify nothing more than rather ordinary piping,
distinguishing itself, if at all, by its fragility or weakness. Yet
if you are directly before her, it is no mere piping. For a full
understanding of her art it is necessary to see her as well as hear
her. Even if this were only our everyday piping, a certain
peculiarity must be considered: Here is someone creating a solemn
spectacle of the everyday. It is truly no feat to crack a nut, and
therefore no one would think to gather an audience for the purpose
of entertaining them with nutcracking. But if he should do so, and
if he should succeed in his aim, then it cannot be a matter of mere
nutcracking. Or alternatively, it is a matter of nutcracking, but
as it turns out we have overlooked the art of nutcracking because
we were so proficient at it that it is this new nutcracker who is
the first to demonstrate what it actually entails, whereby it could
be even more effective if he were less expert in nutcracking than
the majority of us.
Perhaps it is much the same with Josephine’s
singing: We admire in her what in ourselves we do not admire in the
least. In this last respect, I must say, she agrees with us
wholeheartedly. I was once present when someone, as often happens
of course, called attention to the ubiquitous folk piping; it was
the most passing reference, but it was more than enough for
Josephine. I have never seen a smile so sarcastic and so arrogant
as the one she then displayed; she, who is the very embodiment of
delicacy—uncommonly so among a people rich in such feminine
ideals—seemed positively vulgar at that moment; she must have
realized this at once, owing to her great sensitivity, and
controlled herself. In any event, she denies any connection between
her own art and piping. For anyone of the opposite opinion, she has
only contempt and, most likely, unacknowledged hatred. Nor is this
simple vanity; for the opposition, to which I myself partly
subscribe, certainly admires her no less than the rest of the
crowd, but Josephine does not desire mere admiration, she wants to
be admired in precisely the manner she dictates; mere admiration is
of no merit to her. And seated before her, one understands her:
Opposition is only possible from a distance; seated before her one
knows: This piping of hers is not piping.
Since piping is one of our unconscious habits, one
might suppose that there would be some piping from Josephine’s
audience as well. We are made happy by her art, and when we are
happy we pipe. But her audience does not pipe, we are as quiet as
mice, as if we were partaking of the peace we long for, and this
somewhat restrains us from our own piping, we keep silent. Is it
her singing that enchants us, or isn’t it rather the solemn
stillness that envelops that tiny frail voice? Once while Josephine
was singing, some foolish young thing also began, in all innocence,
to pipe. Now it was just the same as what we were hearing from
Josephine; out in front of us was this piping that was still
tremulous despite all the practice, and here in the audience was
this unselfconscious infantile piping. It would have been
impossible to define the difference, but we at once hissed and
whistled to quiet the troublemaker, although this wasn’t really
necessary for she would surely have crept away in fear and shame;
meanwhile Josephine, quite beside herself, sounded her most
triumphal piping with her arms outflung and her neck thrown back as
far as she could.
But she is always like that; every little thing,
every chance incident, every nuisance—a floorboard creaking, teeth
grinding, or a lamp flickering—she considers cause to heighten the
effect of her song. In her opinion her singing falls on deaf ears
anyway; there is no lack of enthusiasm and applause, but she has
long since given up hope of genuine understanding as she conceives
it. In this way every disturbance is more than welcome to her; any
external influence conflicting with the purity of her song that can
be defeated easily, or defeated without struggle but by
confrontation alone, can help to raise the awareness of the crowd
and teach it, if not understanding, at least awed respect.
And if small events serve her so well, great ones
serve her even better. We lead very uneasy lives; each day brings
its surprises, anxieties, hopes, and fears; it would be impossible
for any individual to bear it all without the constant support of
his comrades. But it often becomes difficult anyway; sometimes a
thousand shoulders quake under a burden meant just for one. It is
then that Josephine believes her moment has come. There she stands,
the delicate creature, racked with frightful trembling especially
beneath the breast; it is as though she has focused all her
strength in her singing; as though everything in her that does not
directly serve her song, every power, nearly every means of
sustenance, has been stripped away; as though she were laid bare,
abandoned, entrusted to the care of kind spirits; as though, while
she is so absorbed and entirely given over to her song, a single
cold breath passing over her might kill her. But it is precisely
when she makes just such an appearance that we, her alleged
detractors, tend to remark: “She can’t even pipe. See how she
strains herself horribly to force out, not song—let’s not even
speak about song—but a mere approximation of our customary piping.”
So it seems to us; however, as I already mentioned, this impression
is an inevitable yet fleeting one that quickly fades. Soon we too
are submerged in the feeling of the audience, which listens, body
pressed warmly to body, with reverently held breath.
And in order to gather a crowd of our people around
her—a people almost constantly on the move, scurrying here and
there for reasons that are frequently unclear—Josephine mostly
needs to do no more than adopt her stance: head thrown back, mouth
partially opened, and eyes turned heavenward, to indicate that she
intends to sing. She can do this where she pleases; it need not be
a place visible from very far away—any secluded corner chosen on
the spur of the moment will serve just as well. The news that she
is going to sing spreads immediately, and whole processions are
soon on their way. Now sometimes obstacles do intervene. Josephine
prefers to sing in turbulent times, and then a slew of anxieties
and dangers force us to travel by devious routes, and even with the
best intentions in the world we cannot assemble as quickly as
Josephine would like; she occasionally stands there, striking her
imperious pose, for quite some time without a sufficient
audience—then she flies into a rage, stamps her feet, and swears in
a most unmaidenly fashion; she actually even bites. But even this
type of behavior cannot damage her reputation. Instead of trying to
moderate her excessive demands, people go out of their way to meet
them: Messengers are dispatched to gather new listeners but she is
kept ignorant of this practice; along all the routes, sentries can
be seen waving on the newcomers and urging them to hurry. This
continues until enough of an audience is gathered.
What drives the people to exert themselves to such
an extent on Josephine’s behalf? This question is no easier to
answer than the one about her singing, with which it is closely
connected. If it were possible to assert that the people are
unconditionally devoted to Josephine on account of her singing,
then one could cancel out the first question and combine it with
the second. This, however, is emphatically not the case;
unconditional devotion is rarely found among us; our people—who
above all else love cunning, of a harmless nature of course, and
who childishly whisper and idly chatter over innocent gossip—are a
people who cannot buy into unconditional devotion. Josephine feels
this as well, and it is against this that she fights with all the
force in her feeble throat.
It would certainly be a mistake to take these broad
generalizations too far, however; our people are indeed devoted to
Josephine, just not unconditionally. We would never be capable, for
example, of laughing at Josephine. It can be said that there are
many things about Josephine that invite laughter, and we are always
close to laughing for laughing’s sake. Despite the misery of our
lives, a quiet laugh is always close at hand, as it were, but we do
not laugh at Josephine. I am sometimes under the impression that
our people see their relationship with Josephine this way: that
this fragile creature in need of protection and somehow worthy of
distinction (in her own opinion worthy of distinction because of
her song) is entrusted to their care and must be looked after. The
reason for this is not clear to anyone; it seems only to be an
established fact. But one does not laugh at what is entrusted to
one’s care; to laugh would be a breach of duty. The utmost spite
that the most malicious of us is capable of directing at Josephine
is to occasionally say: “We stop laughing when we see
Josephine.”
So the people look after Josephine in the same way
that a father assumes the care of a child whose hand—whether in
appeal or command one cannot tell—is stretched out to him. One
might not think that our people are equipped to fulfill these
paternal duties, but in reality we do perform them, at least in
this case, in an exemplary manner; no one individual could do what
in this respect the people as a whole are able to do. To be sure,
the disparity in strength between the people and any individual is
so great that the charge need only be drawn into the warmth of
their presence and he will be protected enough. Certainly no one
dares to mention such things to Josephine. “I pipe at your
protection,” she says then. “Yes, you pipe, don’t you,” we think.
Besides, she is not seriously refuting us when she rebels like
this—rather it is childish behavior and childish gratitude—and it
is a father’s place to pay no attention.
And yet something more is going on here that is
less easily explained by the relationship between the people and
Josephine; namely, Josephine is of a different opinion: It is her
belief that it is she who protects the people. When we are facing
trouble, be it political or economic, it is her song that
supposedly saves us, nothing short of that; and if it does not
drive out the misfortune, it at least gives us the strength to bear
it. She does not express it in these words or in any other words;
as a matter of fact she never says much at all, she is silent amid
the chatter-boxes, but it flashes from her eyes, and from her
clamped mouth (there are not many among us who can keep their
mouths closed—she can) it is clearly decipherable. Whenever we get
bad news—and many days we get hit with it thick and fast, lies and
half-truths included—she rises at once, whereas usually she’s sunk
wearily on the floor, she rises and cranes her neck to look out
over her flock like a shepherd before a storm. Of course children
do make similar claims in their wild, impulsive fashion, but
Josephine’s claim is not quite so groundless as theirs. She
certainly does not save us, nor does she give us strength; it is
easy to pose as the savior of a people who are inured to suffering,
unsparing of themselves, swift in decisions, well acquainted with
death, timid in appearance only as they must dwell in an atmosphere
of constant and reckless danger, and who in any case are as
prolific as they are brave; it is easy, as I say, to hold oneself
up as the savior of this people who have somehow always saved
themselves at the cost, however, of many sacrifices the likes of
which strike historians—generally we ignore historical research
completely—cold with horror. And yet it is true that during times
of emergency we cling closer to Josephine’s voice than at any other
time. The threats hanging over us make us quieter, more humble,
more compliant to Josephine’s commands; we are happy to gather
together, happy to huddle close to one another, especially because
it is an occasion so far removed from the preoccupying torment; it
is as if in all haste—yes, haste is necessary, as Josephine is all
too likely to forget—we were drinking a communal cup of peace
before battle. It is not so much a song recital as a public
gathering, and moreover a gathering that is completely silent
except for the faint piping up front; the hour is too serious for
us to spend it chatting.
Josephine, of course, could never be content with a
relationship of this kind. Despite all the nervous tension that
overtakes her because her position has never been clearly defined,
there is much that she does not see, blinded as she is by
self-conceit, and she can be made to overlook a great deal more
without much effort; a swarm of flatterers is always hovering about
her working toward this end, in effect performing a public
service—however, to be an incidental and unnoticed singer in the
corner of a public gathering (although it would be no small thing
in and of itself), for that she certainly would not sacrifice her
song.
Nor is she obliged to do this, for her art does not
go unnoticed. Even though we basically concern ourselves with quite
other matters, and the silence that prevails is not due to her
singing alone (some listeners do not look up at all but bury their
faces in their neighbors’ fur, so Josephine seems to be exerting
herself in vain out there in front), something from her piping—this
cannot be denied—inevitably does come through to us. This piping,
which rises up when silence is imposed on all others, emerges
almost like a message from the people to each individual;
Josephine’s thin piping amid grave decisions is almost like our
meager existence amid the tumult of a hostile world. Josephine
asserts herself; this mere nothing of a voice, this mere nothing of
a performance, asserts itself and makes its way through to us; it
does us good to think of that. At such moments we could never
endure a true singer, should one ever be found among us, and we
would unanimously reject any such performance as absurd. May
Josephine be spared from perceiving that the very fact we listen to
her is proof that she is no singer. She must have some suspicion of
this—why else would she so passionately deny that we do listen to
her—but she keeps singing and piping away her suspicion.
But she could draw comfort from other things: We
really do listen to her to some extent, probably in much the same
way one listens to a true singer; she manages to affect us in ways
that a true singer would strive in vain to bring about, ways that
produce their effect in us precisely because her means are so
inadequate. The manner in which we lead our lives is no doubt
responsible for this.
Youth does not exist among our people, and
childhood only lasts a moment. Demands are regularly made to
guarantee the children special freedom and protection, to grant
them their right to be a little carefree, to engage in a little
lighthearted foolishness, a little play, and to ensure that these
rights be acknowledged and steps taken to secure them. Such demands
are made and nearly everyone approves them; there is nothing one
could approve of more, but there is also nothing less likely to be
conceded given the reality of our daily lives; one approves of
these demands and one attempts to implement them; but we soon lapse
back into the old ways. To be frank, our life is such that as soon
as a child can run around a bit and distinguish his surroundings a
little, he must likewise look after himself like an adult. The
regions over which we are dispersed and in which we are forced to
live, for economic reasons, are too vast, our enemies too numerous,
the dangers facing us everywhere too incalculable—we cannot shield
the children from the struggle for existence; if we did, it would
mean a premature end for them. These depressing facts are further
reinforced by another more uplifting one: the fertility of our
race. One generation—and each is numerous—comes on the heels of the
preceding one; the children don’t have time to be children. Other
peoples may raise their children with great care; they may erect
schools for their little ones and from these schools the children,
the future of the race, may come streaming out every day; but among
those peoples, it is the same children who come pouring out like
that day after day, over a long period of time. We have no schools,
but bounding forth from our people are the continuous swarms of our
children arriving at the briefest intervals, cheerfully peeping or
chirping for as long as they can’t yet pipe, rolling along or
forced forward in the tumult for as long as they can’t yet run,
clumsily sweeping everything before them by their sheer mass for as
long as they can’t yet see—our children! And not the same children
as in those schools—no, always new ones, again and again, without
end, without pause. Hardly does a child appear than it is no longer
a child; new childish faces are already pressing through, so many
and so fast that they are indistinguishable, all rosy with
happiness. Truthfully, however delightful this may be and however
much others may envy us for it, and rightly so, we simply cannot
give our children a proper childhood. And that has its
consequences. A certain deeply rooted and indelible childishness
pervades our people; we sometimes behave with the utmost
foolishness in direct opposition to our best quality, our
infallible common sense; this brand of foolishness is the same as
that of children—a senseless, extravagant, grandiose, frivolous
foolishness, and often all for the sake of a little fun. And
although our pleasure naturally cannot be the wholehearted pleasure
of a child, without a doubt there is still something of this in it.
Josephine has also profited from our people’s childishness since
the beginning.
But our people are not only childish, we are also
in a sense prematurely old; childhood and age come to us
differently than to others. We have no youth, we are grown up all
at once and then stay grown up for too long; a certain weariness
and hopelessness marks the nature of our people, though we are
fundamentally tough and confident. Our lack of musicality is
probably connected to this—we’re too old for music; exultation does
not suit our gravity, we wave it away wearily; we content ourselves
with piping, a little piping here and there, that suits us fine.
Who knows, there may be some musical talent among us; however, if
there were, the character of our people would suppress it before it
could develop. Josephine, on the other hand, can pipe to her
heart’s delight or sing or whatever she wants to call it; that
doesn’t bother us, that’s fine by us, that we can put up with; if
there is anything musical contained within, it is so reduced as to
be barely traceable; a certain musical tradition is preserved but
without having to be the least burden to us.
But our people, given what they are, still get
something more from Josephine. At her concerts, especially in
troubled times, only the very young are interested in the singer as
such, only they gaze in astonishment as she purses her lips, expels
the air between her dainty front teeth, swoons in admiration and
wonder for the sounds she herself is producing, and uses this
lowered position to propel herself to fresh peaks of achievement
that are continually incredible to her. Meanwhile, the majority of
the audience—this is plain to see—has retreated into itself. Here
in these brief gaps between their troubles our people dream; it is
as if the limbs of each were loosened, as if every last uneasy
individual were for once allowed to stretch out and relax freely in
the great warm bed of the people. And into these dreams drops
Josephine’s piping, bit by bit; she calls it purled,q we
call it forced; but at any rate here it is in its rightful place,
as nowhere else, finding just the moment that awaited it, as music
hardly ever does otherwise. Something of our meager and
foreshortened childhood is in it, something of a lost and
irretrievable happiness, but also something of our active everyday
life, these incomprehensible but actual moments of gaiety that
cannot be suppressed. This is all expressed not in large and
imposing tones, but softly, breathlessly, confidentially, and
sometimes a little hoarsely. Of course it is piping. How could it
not be? Piping is the vernacular of our people; only many pipe
their whole lives long without knowing it, while here piping is
free from the fetters of everyday life, and so it also sets us free
for a short time. We would certainly not want to relinquish these
performances.
But it is a very long way from there to Josephine’s
assertion that she renews our strength during such times and so on
and so forth; at least it is for ordinary people, even if it is not
for Jose phine’s flatterers. “What other explanation could there
be,” they say with rather shameless audacity. “How else could you
explain the huge crowds, especially when there is imminent danger
and when these crowds have sometimes even hindered our taking
proper precautions to avert the danger in time.” Now this last
point is unfortunately true but can hardly be counted among
Josephine’s claims to fame, particularly if one adds that when such
gatherings have been unexpectedly ambushed by the enemy and many of
our people have lain dead as a result, Josephine, who is entirely
to blame and most likely attracted the enemy by her piping,
invariably occupies the safest position and is the first to be
whisked quickly and quietly away under cover of her escort.
Everyone is well aware of this, yet they come running to whatever
spot Josephine arbitrarily decides upon to strike up her singing
and whenever she so pleases. From this one might conclude that
Josephine almost stands beyond the law, that she may do whatever
she likes even if it endangers the community, and that she will be
forgiven everything. If this were so, then even Josephine’s claims
would be comprehensible; yes, in the freedom allowed to her, a
privilege granted by the people to no one else and in actual
contravention of our laws, one might detect an admission of the
fact that our people—just as she alleges—do not understand
Josephine, that they gape helplessly at her art, feel unworthy of
it, and try to assuage the pain they must cause her by making a
desperate sacrifice: to place her person and her wishes as far
outside their jurisdiction as her art is beyond their
comprehension. Well, this is just categorically untrue; perhaps the
people individually capitulate to Josephine too readily, but
collectively they capitulate unconditionally to no one, and so not
to her either.
For a long time now, perhaps since the very start
of her artistic career, Josephine has been fighting to be excused
from all work on account of her singing; she should be relieved
from the burden of earning her daily bread and anything else
involved in the struggle for existence, and the slack should,
presumably, be taken up by the people as a whole. A hasty
enthusiast—and there have been some—might conclude that this demand
is inherently justified, owing to its strangeness and the mental
state needed to conceive it. But our people draw other conclusions
and quietly refuse her. Nor do they bother much to refute the
arguments on which it is based. Josephine argues, for example, that
the strain of work is bad for her voice, that the strain of work
cannot, needless to say, remotely compare to the strain of singing,
but it does render it impossible to rest sufficiently after singing
and recuperate for further singing, so she must exhaust herself
entirely and within these confines never perform at her peak. The
people listen to her arguments and pay no attention. This people,
so easily moved, will sometimes not be moved at all. Their refusal
is sometimes so severe that Josephine is taken aback; she appears
to comply, does her proper share of work, and sings as well as she
can, but this only lasts awhile. Then with renewed strength—her
strength for this purpose seems inexhaustible—she takes up the
fight again.
Now it is clear that what Josephine is really
aiming for is not literally what she demands. She is reasonable,
she does not shy from work—shirking is quite unknown among us
anyway—and even if her petition were granted, her life would go on
as before; her work would not impede her singing, nor would her
singing improve; what she is aiming for is an unambiguous public
recognition of her art that would last forever and far surpass any
known precedent. But while everything else seems to be within her
grasp, this persistently eludes her. Perhaps she should have taken
a different tack from the beginning, perhaps she understands her
mistake by now, but she cannot back down; any retreat would be
tantamount to self-betrayal; now she must stand or fall by her
demand.
If, as she contends, she truly had enemies, they
could be greatly amused, without having to lift a finger, by the
spectacle of this battle. But she has no enemies, and even if she
does meet with criticism here and there, no one is amused by this
battle of hers for the mere fact that in this circumstance the
people exhibit a cold, judicial manner that is rarely seen
otherwise. And even if one approves of it in this case, the mere
thought that such an attitude might be adopted toward oneself
dispels any pleasure. What is important here is not the people’s
refusal of Josephine’s demand or the demand itself but the fact
that the people are capable of presenting such a stony,
impenetrable front to one of their own, and it is all the more
impenetrable because this particular citizen is in every other
sense treated with fatherly—actually more than fatherly—with
deferential concern.
Imagine that instead of an entire people there were
one individual: One might suppose that this man had been giving in
to Josephine but at the same time desperately wishing to put an end
to all this indulgence; that he had been superhuman in the
concessions he granted, firm in the belief that there would be a
natural limit to them; yes, that he had conceded more than was
necessary for the sole purpose of hastening the process, to spoil
Josephine and push her to ask for more and more until she did reach
this ultimate demand, at which point he could, being prepared well
in advance, reply with a final, curt refusal. Now this is
absolutely not how things stand, the people have no need of such
guile; besides, their admiration of Josephine is sincere and deeply
rooted, and Josephine’s demand is so outrageous that any simple
child could have told her the foreseeable outcome. However, it may
be that considerations such as these do enter into Josephine’s
thinking on the matter and so add a further sting of bitterness to
the pain of refusal.
But even if she does entertain these ideas, she
does not allow them to deter her from her campaign. Recently the
campaign has even been intensified; where she once fought with
words alone, she is resorting to other methods that she thinks will
prove more effective but in our opinion will be more dangerous for
her.
Some feel that Josephine is becoming so desperate
because she feels she is growing old and her voice is weakening,
and so it seems high time to wage the final battle for recognition.
I don’t believe it. If it were true, Josephine would not be
Josephine. For her, there is no getting old, no weakness in her
voice. If she demands something, it is not due to outward forces
but to an inner logic. She reaches for the highest laurels, not
because they are hanging slightly lower for a moment but because
they are the highest; if it were in her power she would hang them
higher still.
This disregard of external difficulties certainly
does not prevent her from employing the most unworthy methods. She
feels her rights are beyond question, so that how she secures them
does not matter, especially in this world where, as she sees it, it
is the worthy methods that fail. Perhaps this is why she has
transferred the fight for her rights from the arena of song to
another that she cares very little about. Supporters have passed
around statements of hers to the effect that she feels thoroughly
capable of singing at such a level that every strata of the people,
even the furthest reaches of the opposition, would find true
pleasure in it—a true pleasure not by popular standards, for the
people maintain they have always found pleasure in her singing, but
a true pleasure by Josephine’s standards. But, she adds, since she
can neither falsify higher standards nor pander to lower ones, her
singing must stay as it is. Yet when it comes to the fight to be
freed from work, that is another matter; it is also, of course, on
behalf of her singing; however, in this case she is not using the
precious weapon of song directly, therefore any means she employs
is good enough.
So, for example, a rumor spread that if her
petition were not granted, Josephine intended to shorten her trill
notes. I know nothing of trill notes and have never noticed any
sign of them in her singing, but Josephine is going to shorten her
trill notes; for the time being she is not going to eliminate them,
just shorten them. She has purportedly carried out her threat,
although I, for one, have perceived no difference in her
performance. The people as a whole listened as always without
commenting on the trill notes and did not budge an inch in response
to her demand. Incidentally, it is undeniable that Josephine’s
thoughts can sometimes be as pleasing as her figure; for instance,
after that performance, as if her decision with regard to the trill
notes had been too harsh and too sudden a blow to the people, she
announced that the next time she would again sing the trill notes
in their complete form. But after the next concert she changed her
tune once more: there was definitely to be an end to the elongated
trills and they would not recur until a favorable decision on her
petition was reached. Well, the people let all these announcements,
decisions, and counterdecisions go in one ear and out the other,
much like a preoccupied adult with the chattering of a child: well
disposed at heart but unmoved.
But Josephine does not give up. She recently
claimed, for example, that she injured her foot while working, so
that it was difficult to stand and sing, and since she can only
sing while standing, her songs would now have to be cut short.
Although she limps and leans on her group of supporters, no one
believes she is really injured. Even allowing for her exceptionally
sensitive constitution, we are a working people and Josephine is
one of us; if we were to start limping at every little scratch, the
entire population would never stop limping. But although she may
permit herself to be led around like a cripple, although she may
display herself in this pathetic condition more often than usual,
the people still listen gratefully and appreciatively to her
singing just as before and don’t bother much about the abridgment
of the songs.
Since she cannot continue limping forever, she
invents something else: She pleads exhaustion, disaffection,
faintness. And so now we get a theatrical performance as well as a
concert. Behind Josephine we see her supporters entreating and
imploring her to sing. She would be happy to oblige, but she
cannot. They comfort her and caress her with flattery, they
practically carry her to a previously chosen spot where she is
supposed to sing. Finally, bursting inexplicably into tears, she
relents, but when she prepares to sing, clearly at the end of her
tether, drooping, her arms not outspread as usual but hanging
limply at her sides, giving the impression that they are perhaps
somewhat too short—as she prepares to strike a note, no, it’s no
use after all; a reluctant shake of the head tells us as much and
she swoons before our eyes. Then she does indeed rally again and
sings, much the same as ever in my opinion; perhaps a more
discerning ear might detect a slight increase in feeling that does,
however, heighten the effect. And in the end she is actually less
tired than before and departs with a firm tread, if such a term can
be used to describe her rapid, mincing steps, refusing all
assistance from her supporters, her cold eyes measuring the crowd,
who respectfully make way for her.
That was just a few days ago. But the latest news
is that she has disappeared, just at a time when she was expected
to sing. It is not only her supporters who are looking for her,
many others have devoted themselves to the search, but all in vain;
Josephine has vanished, she does not wish to sing, she does not
wish to be invited to sing; she has deserted us for good this
time.
It is curious how seriously she miscalculates, the
clever creature, so seriously that one must believe that she did
not calculate at all but is only being driven onward by her fate,
which can only be a sad one in our world. She abandons her singing
of her own accord and of her own accord destroys the power she has
gained over our hearts. How could she ever have acquired that power
when she knows so little of our hearts? She hides herself away and
does not sing. In the meantime our people—calmly, without visible
disappointment, a proud, self-sufficient people, who in all truth
and despite appearances can only bestow gifts, never receive them,
even from Josephine—our people continue on their way.
But Josephine’s path can go nowhere except down.
Soon the time will come when her last note sounds and fades into
silence. She is a small episode in the eternal history of our
people, and the people will overcome their loss. This will not be
easy for us though; how can we gather together in utter silence?
And yet, weren’t we silent even when Josephine was present? Was her
actual piping significantly louder and more lively than the memory
of it will be? Was it ever more than simply a memory, even during
her lifetime? Had not the people rather, in their wisdom, so dearly
cherished Josephine’s song precisely so that in this way it would
not be lost?
So perhaps we shall not miss very much after all.
While Josephine, delivered from earthly torment—in her opinion the
privilege of chosen spirits—will happily lose herself in the
countless number of our people’s heroes, and soon, since we are not
students of history, will be even further delivered by being
forgotten like all her brothers.